EEOC: Lawsuits and Settlements – January 16 to 31, 2026

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission EEOC on a desk.

Each month, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) files lawsuits and settles cases covering the federal laws they are responsible for enforcing. These federal laws include:

Below is a list of lawsuits and settlements by the EEOC in from January 16 to 31, 2026.


EEOC Announcements


EEOC Lawsuits


No posted actions this period.


EEOC Settlements

Michigan: Sundance, Inc. and Black River Bells to Pay $100,000 in EEOC Sexual Harassment Lawsuit

Allegations

Sex discrimination; Sexual harassment; Retaliation

Laws Involved

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

State

Michigan

Summary

According to the EEOC’s lawsuit, Sundance and Black River Bells employed an area coach who exercised managerial control over several of their Taco Bell locations. For months in 2022, he frequently sexually harassed a group of female employees, including underage employees. The harassment included inappropriate sexual comments, asking underage employees if they were sexually active, asking an employee if she would give him “sugar” when she turned 18, unwanted and inappropriate touching, and asking an assistant manager for videos or images of her having sex with her boyfriend. Sundance and Black River Bells also terminated an assistant manager the same day she reported the area coach’s harassment, according to the suit.


Oklahoma: McDonald’s Franchisee Arch Fellow North to Pay $80,000 in EEOC Sexual Harassment Lawsuit

Allegations

Sex discrimination; Sexual harassment

Laws Involved

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

State

Oklahoma

Summary

According to the EEOC’s lawsuit, an adult male supervisor sexually harassed the teenage worker for about a month in November 2021. When Arch Fellow North learned about the supervisor’s sexual harassment, it failed to properly investigate the allegations and allowed the supervisor to continue supervising the teenage victim and other young workers. As a result, the teenage victim had to quit.


Tennessee: DHL Supply Chain (USA) to Pay $640,000 in EEOC Sexual Harassment and Retaliation Suit

Allegations

Sex discrimination; Sexual harassment; Retaliation

Laws Involved

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

State

Tennessee

Summary

According to the lawsuit, around November 2021, a female DHL employee complained to three supervisors that she was being sexually harassed by an operations manager and requested not to be left alone with him. None of the supervisors reported her complaints, as required by DHL policy. Later, DHL fired her for alleged insubordination when she did not submit to the operations manager’s demand to meet with him one-on-one. Other female employees confirmed that male coworkers, leads, and supervisors subjected them to sexual harassment. Many female associates complained, and DHL ignored their complaints, EEOC’s lawsuit charged.


Utah: Franchise Management, LLC to Pay $150,000 in EEOC Sexual Harassment Lawsuit

Allegations

Sex discrimination; Sexual harassment; Retaliation

Laws Involved

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

State

Utah

Summary

According to the lawsuit, a male district manager who oversaw several Subway locations sexually harassed a teenage male worker, culminating in forcible sexual abuse. For months, the manager made sexual comments to the teenager, including asking him for pictures in his underwear, and trying to discuss sexual preferences, sexual experiences and pornography with him. The manager also sent the teenager pictures of the manager in his underwear. The harassment culminated in the manager sexually abusing the teenager twice during a work shift in September 2020.


Washington: Builders FirstSource to Pay $26,000 to Settle EEOC Disability and Age Discrimination Lawsuit

Allegations

Age discrimination; Disability discrimination

Laws Involved

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA); Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

State

Washington

Summary

According to the EEOC’s lawsuit, a 67-year-old worker was assigned by a staffing agency to work as a temporary assembler at BFS’s truss assembly facility in Arlington, Washington. The worker was qualified for the assembler position because he had worked at other physically demanding jobs. The suit said that in June 2023, after observing the worker briefly, BFS’s general manager regarded him as not suited to perform the job and asked for a replacement.


Employment Law Updates

Laws change in a moment.

Sign up to stay informed.

Select an Option

Visiting on behalf of:

Have employees in more than one state? SUBSCRIBE HERE!

THANK YOU FOR SUBSCRIBING!

We hope you find our newsletters help you better navigate employment and labor law issues.

Close the CTA